The webcast included three speakers: Pat Johnson, Diane DeFord, and Mary Cappellini. All three of these speakers spoke from experience and gave valuable resources and insight on how teaching in small groups and using guiding reading will help the children progress through utilization of reading strategies and incorporate meaning for text. Overall, I found this webcast to be influential on my thinking about teaching in small groups and using text to make meaning so that reading becomes more than sounding things out or memorization of letter sounds. Reading then becomes a way of making meaning and problem solving. The child should be able to independently work through a text and use things such as visual clues to make predictions and inferences about the text. With a teacher that models these important connections and allows many opportunities for her students to practice using different strategies, there will be much more success and learning in the classroom.
The first speaker, Pat Johnson, spoke mainly about students reading words and understanding the text they have in front of them. She discusses the importance of asking questions such as: What will be the focus of discussion? What does it mean to teach reading? and What should we teach in small groups? I really like how she mentions to teach the reader, not the book. The books should be the support the readers need to practice their reading processing systems. Because teaching is future oriented, the student may not always read the "correct" word on a page, but if the word makes sense in the context of the sentence and shows evidence that child is making meaning, for Pat, this means much more than a random attempt using phonics. She provided a few examples of students using these strategies successfully and spoke briefly about the importance of teaching fluency. She reiterates that fluency is more than accuracy and speed, it involves pacing, reading punctuation, and learning to listen to we sound when we read aloud. She provides her students with three prompts, one of them for example, is "did that sound choppy to you?" If the child throws a thumb up or down to signal their answer. This small lesson teaches a lot about awareness and self monitoring. One of the last few points I found relevant to my teaching was the idea of slow and quick processing. While slow processing is necessary when strategies are newly acquired, quick processing is a signal that the child has had multiple opportunities to practice them. By keeping meaning at the forefront, children will create a sense of urgency with the reading and have a better appreciation for the story or text and comprehend the text with ease.
The second Speaker, Diane DeFord, spoke about making instructional decisions that benefit the child's individual needs and aid in growth through various strategies. She stresses the importance of getting to know the students and what their strengths and weaknesses are in reading. Not only academically, but socially as well. What are the child's interests? What are the child's favorite subjects? How might the child interpret this particular book? Next it becomes important to access the students progress and make sure there are records of reading and reading levels. Matching the text to the reader is the best way to support independence in reading. When working in the small group, trying to focus on one or two strategies that need some support is a great way to aid in development of a self-monitoring system. She explains that teaching the students to think while reading is the best way for them to create meaning. While learning to use MSV together, the child will develop the skills they need to read any text. The most important part of her speech for me was that books are NOT neutral. It is the teachers job to make intentional choices in regards to the books she chooses for her students. The text should make the right demands on the reader. DeFord then discusses the Framework of a Lesson and how the teacher works through a text to make sure it has the resources needed to teach a particular strategy. For example, in Book introductions, the teacher may first tell the students briefly what the story is about then ask them to look through the pictures and discuss assumptions and predictions about the text prior to reading. Overall just being aware of changes in the students and knowing that each child will be different is key. It makes sense that she says: "if the lesson is not effective, it is not the students that need to change, it is the teaching!"
The final speaker, Mary Cappellini, spoke mainly about ELL (English language learners) students and how incorporating lessons that involve small group work with individuals in mixed levels of reading will prompt learning. To close the achievement gap teachers need to hold each student to the same high standard. She explains then that talk is critical! Getting to know each student individually will help the teacher guide the lessons effectively and with meaning. Noticing language patterns, and what their strengths and weaknesses are will aid in development of lessons that make sense to each student. Looking at the child's ability to use these strategies and making charts and keeping record of the child's monitoring skills will make pairing students up and focus groups easier. One big thing she came back to is being aware of present and past tense. When learning a new language this can be a very difficult concept to grasp. While the student may struggle with a particular book at a certain reading level, it may just be the verb tense causing the issue, and not the vocabulary. This is where awareness is so important. Instead of giving the child a lower level book, maybe try a different book at the same level and see if there is a difference. She mentions that having the student be vocal is also another way to access understanding. Paraphrasing is a great example of this, the child can put the story into their own words. I really liked the idea of using focus sheets, or "goal sheets" that record the students thoughts, comprehension of vocab, and provide a reference for past reading and understanding of text. It seems valuable for both the teacher and the student.
There were many points in this webcast that made me think twice about how I would handle certain situations in the classroom but gave me valuable resources and sparked interest in working more effectively in small groups with all my students. This seems to be more about reaching each student individually, and using the community as support in that. I really like learning about this method of teaching reading and I am seeing a connection between writing as well.